Medicaid Matters to Those with Prader-Willi Syndrome

This is how Trump’s Big Stupid Bill is Affecting People with Disabilities.

A woman with long brown hair stands outside on a sunny day, speaking about how changes to Medicaid could affect her adult son with Prader-Willi Syndrome.
Daniel’s mother speaks to NBC News NOW about the potential impact of Medicaid work requirements under Trump’s new legislation. Screenshot taken at 00:42, used under fair use for commentary.

I wasn’t expecting to get emotional about it.

I clicked on a video — How new Medicaid work requirements could affect families with disabled children — expecting another dry political segment with infographics, maybe a few concerned talking heads.

But just over a minute in, something pierced through the screen like a dart to the chest.

His mother said the words: Prader-Willi Syndrome.

And suddenly, it wasn’t about policy anymore. It wasn’t about red states or blue bills. It wasn’t even about Medicaid in the abstract.

It was about us: my family, my sister-in-law, and the fragile ecosystem we’ve built around her.

It was about love. Sacrifice. Fear. And the unbearable burden of political cruelty disguised as reform.

A Familiar Name, A Familiar Life

My husband’s youngest sister has Prader-Willi Syndrome.

That name may not mean much to most people. It didn’t to me when I first heard it either. But once it enters your life, it never leaves.

Prader-Willi is a rare genetic disorder that affects the hypothalamus, which in turn disrupts hunger signals, cognitive development, emotional regulation, and muscle tone. The short version? It’s hard. And unrelenting.

And deeply misunderstood.

People with Prader-Willi often have an insatiable appetite that can’t be sated. Not because of bad behavior, but because their brain simply doesn’t register fullness. Without constant supervision and a tightly controlled environment, this can become life-threatening.

Food security in the literal, household sense is nearly impossible. Imagine living with someone who will do anything — anything — to access food. Locks on cabinets. Alarms on refrigerators. Scheduled, portioned meals. Daily emotional meltdowns. Midnight medical emergencies.

Now imagine being the siblings — whose lives have always taken a back seat to their sibling’s needs — who step up when your parents are gone.

After the Funeral

Ten years ago, my husband lost both of his parents. They died within a short span of each other, as if the weight of caregiving and grief were too much to stagger.

Their deaths didn’t just leave emotional holes in the family — they triggered a bureaucratic chain reaction.

What happens to someone like his sister when her primary caregivers are gone?

The answer, in our case, was Florida’s Medicaid system. Specifically, a home that’s part of the ARC of Alachua County in Gainesville.

It’s not a mansion. It’s not a miracle. But it’s good. It’s safe. It’s staffed by professionals who know what they’re doing — people who’ve become like family to us. It’s somewhere my husband’s sister can live with dignity.

And it runs almost entirely on Medicaid funding.

Which brings me back to the video I mentioned. And Daniel’s mom, Kimberly.

The Echo of Her Voice

You can hear the tremor in Kimberly’s voice when she talks about the “One Big Beautiful Bill” — Trump’s newly signed legislation that imposes national work requirements on Medicaid recipients.

She’s scared. But it’s a specific kind of fear that only people like us really understand.

Because it’s not just fear of losing coverage.

It’s fear of what happens next. Of who will fill in the gaps. Of which caregiver will be forced to give up their job, their sleep, their health to keep a loved one alive. Of which future milestones — retirement, relocation, dreams deferred — will once again be sacrificed for survival.

Her son, Daniel, has Prader-Willi. So does my sister-in-law.

And that means her fear is my fear. Her future is our future. Her breaking point may soon be ours.

What They Don’t Understand

To the architects of this legislation — and to the smirking pundits who push the idea that “people should just work if they want benefits” — disability exists only in two flavors: wheelchair or bedridden. Everything else, they suspect, is laziness, fraud, or “mental issues” that could be solved with bootstraps.

But Prader-Willi doesn’t look the way they expect disability to look.

There’s no neon sign over someone’s head that says: I need Medicaid to survive. And so these policies slip through. Passed by politicians who’ve never shared a home with someone who needs help using the bathroom, who doesn’t understand money, who will probably never live independently or hold a job.

The irony, of course, is that the work requirements aren’t even targeting people with known, documented disabilities like my sister-in-law. She’s technically exempt.

But that’s not the point.

The point is that Medicaid is a complex system. A home like hers doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It requires staff. Staffing agencies. Reimbursement paperwork. State oversight. All of which depend on a functioning, flexible Medicaid framework that treats care as a public good — not a moral debt to be worked off by someone else.

When you gut Medicaid — even just “for the lazy ones” — you gut it for all of us. The whole system starts to buckle. Services shrink. Providers back out. Waitlists grow. Coverage gaps widen.

People lose jobs. And families like mine start to panic.

The Arithmetic of Sacrifice

Every family with a loved one who has a disability knows the arithmetic. We’ve all done it in our heads a thousand times.

How many hours can I work this week and still make sure her needs are met?

If we move closer to them, can we afford rent?

Can we take a vacation, even just for a few days, without worrying something will go wrong?

How much time can I give before I start to unravel?

There is no life untouched by this math. We become part-time caregivers even when we’re not in the same house. We manage medications, appointments, behavior plans. We stay on the emergency contact list.

We drive across counties and fly across countries for birthday parties that must be scheduled weeks or months in advance. We field midnight calls from hospitals or staff.

And we do it because we love them.

But love isn’t policy. Love can’t fill the gap when a political decision cuts the budget for her home. Love doesn’t pay overtime to the overworked night nurse or replace the van that just broke down.

Love doesn’t get reimbursed for giving up one’s life to care for someone who cannot live without care.

Medicaid does. Or it did.

And now? Now it feels like we’re holding our breath.

The Cruelty Is the Calculation

I’ve heard people say, “The cruelty is the point.” But in this case, it feels more precise to say: the cruelty is the calculation.

This bill isn’t just an ideological move. It’s a test.

A test to see which Americans will tolerate the idea that some lives aren’t worth public money.

A test to see how many exceptions to empathy people can be convinced to make: “Well, obviously we care about people with real disabilities… but not the ones gaming the system.” “Of course we support Medicaid, but not for people who refuse to work.”

The fine print doesn’t matter. The public hears “work requirements” and assumes it’s about people who should be working.

But here’s what they don’t hear:

  • That these rules burden single parents already caring for disabled children.
  • That administrative hurdles lead people to lose coverage even when they qualify.
  • That support staff — home health aides, disability specialists, care managers — often leave underfunded systems that become impossible to navigate.
  • That homes like the one in Gainesville, where my sister-in-law lives, are Medicaid.

You can’t attack the program and pretend the most vulnerable won’t bleed.

What We Stand to Lose

If my sister-in-law’s funding were reduced or revoked, what would happen?

Would we pull her out of the only home she’s known for the past several years where she’s found stability?

Would we bring her to live with us, changing every aspect of our lives to accommodate the 24/7 care she requires?

Would we trust another overburdened facility, scrambling for space in a broken system?

Would we survive it?

I don’t know the answer. And that’s the part that scares me most.

Because we’ve done everything “right.” We navigated the waivers. We advocated. We went through the assessments. We grieved, and then we planned. And still, we are vulnerable.

Not because of her. Not because of us.

But because someone in Washington decided that working-age adults shouldn’t get “free” healthcare unless they perform for it.

As if life itself isn’t work enough for some people.

As if care isn’t a currency already being spent.

A Voice for Daniel, A Voice for Her

I don’t know Daniel. I may never meet him or his mom. But I recognize her voice. I know the tears she holds back. I know the courage it takes to appear on television and say: Please don’t forget us.

So let me echo it louder: Please don’t forget us.

Don’t forget the families whose lives are shaped not by choice, but by love.

Don’t forget the ones who’ve already given more than they had — time, money, health, dreams.

Don’t forget the quiet heroes who never get to rest, who are always on call, who carry the weight of broken systems so that others can live.

Don’t forget that behind every “program” is a person. And behind every person is a family.

We’re not just statistics. We aren’t lazy. We aren’t disposable.

What we are is scared.

And if this country has any heart left, it must not force us to choose between love and survival.

What Now?

There are times in life when writing feels like a scream into the void. But sometimes, the scream echoes back. Sometimes it reaches another family huddled in their own living room, watching the same clip, feeling the same dread.

Maybe that’s you.

Maybe your sister has Down syndrome. Maybe your son is on the spectrum. Maybe your partner had a stroke last year and can’t return to work. Maybe you’re the caregiver, the sibling, the friend, the advocate.

Maybe you’re the one holding the line.

I don’t have answers for any of us. I don’t have a tidy ending. But I do have a voice. And I’m using it now to say:

This bill — this big stupid bill — isn’t just a policy. It’s a threat.

And for families like mine, the threat isn’t theoretical. It’s real. It’s present. It’s personal.

We need to fight like hell for a country that doesn’t treat disability as a moral failing and caregiving as an optional burden.

We need to say no to cruelty, to indifference, to calculated erasure.

Because Daniel matters. My sister-in-law matters. Your loved ones matter.

And Medicaid matters.

A green awareness ribbon symbolizing disability rights and caregiver advocacy, with the words “We Work Every Day — It’s Called Caring. (Medicaid isn’t a handout. It’s how we survive.)” beneath it.
Green awareness ribbon symbolizing disability and caregiver advocacy. Image via Pixabay: used under Pixabay license (free for commercial use, no attribution required).

Leave a Reply