Operator Syndrome: A Literature Review

Within the span of time stretching from the beginning to the end of the Global War on Terror, social scientists as well as medical professionals have taken the opportunity to study unique aspects of community and support systems in the lives of soldiers, their families and their units or assignments. The U.S. military is vast, containing multiple branches consisting of the Army, Air Force, Marines and Navy. Contained within these branches are smaller micro- communities that span from the National Guard to highly specialized areas, notably Army Rangers, Navy SEALS, Marine Raiders, and other programs identified through Military Occupational Specialties, or MOS’s. While all of these posts present issues distinct to their roles, this review will focus primarily on Operator Syndrome in the Special Operations community, how it is defined, and the challenges it presents to the soldier’s community as a whole.

Defining Operator Syndrome

Operator Syndrome is defined by “interrelated health and functional impairments including traumatic brain injury effects; endocrine dysfunction; sleep disturbance; obstructive sleep apnea; chronic joint/back pain, orthopedic problems, and headaches; substance abuse; depression and suicide; anger; worry, rumination, and stress reactivity; marital, family, and community dysfunction; problems with sexual health and intimacy; being “on guard” or hypervigilant; memory, concentration, and cognitive impairments; vestibular and vision impairments; challenges of the transition from military to civilian life; and common existential issues.” (Frueh et al, 202) While the definition itself reveals various medical effects of a life spent in special operations, it also reveals the issues leading up to how this presents obstacles faced by operators, their families and peers. Often, operators are expected to keep details of their mission sets discreet, as their assignments are often highly classified or prioritized in a way that makes finding community in the civilian world extremely difficult. This means that operators tend to gravitate towards other operators, or members of the military who understand deeply what they may be experiencing and why. However, the community itself is rife with challenges relating to the “warrior ethos” that goes hand in hand with being in special operations.

Christopher Frueh’s Work

Christopher Frueh, a psychologist and professor at the University of Hawaii, coined the phrase Operator Syndrome after over 30 years of studying military personnel in high risk professions. His research, along with decades of compounded evidence, has led to a comprehensive framework for how Special Operators have been affected by years of warfare in high stress situations. Dr. Frueh worked with 50 operators, along with their families and partners, to develop a structured definition that includes physical injury (TBI, blast wave, Fear of CTE, Ortho/Chronic Pain, cognitive problems), Losses (mission focus and intensity, sense of power/efficacy, deaths, identity), Biological Dysfunction (hormone/HPA axis, sex hormones, sleep, chronic arousal elevation, vestibular/vision), and Psychological Factors (PTSD, substance abuse, depression/anger/worry, purpose/motivation). (Frueh et al, 2020) This is also defined as Allostatic Load. “Allostatic load refers to the cumulative burden of chronic stress and life events. It involves the interaction of different physiological systems at varying degrees of activity. When environmental challenges exceed the individual ability to cope, then allostatic overload ensues. Allostatic load is identified by the use of biomarkers and clinical criteria.” (Guidi et al, 2021)

Operator Syndrome Numbers

To understand the scope of this issue, and why this is important when looking at military communities, one must understand statistically how this impacts the special operations community itself, the personnel contained within its numbers, and how frequently it is occurring. “As of 2025, USSOCOM consists of approximately 70,000 Active Duty, Reserve Component, and civilian personnel assigned to its headquarters, its four components, and sub-unified commands. USSOCOM’s components are the U.S. Army Special Operations Command (USASOC), the Naval Special Warfare Command (NSWC), the Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC), and the Marine Forces Special Operations Command (MARSOC). The Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) is a USSOCOM sub-unified command. USSOCOM also includes seven Theater Special Operations Commands (TSOCs). TSOCs are sub-unified commands under their respective Geographic Combatant Commanders (GCCs). TSOCs are special operational headquarters elements designed to support GCC’s special operations logistics, planning, and operational command and control requirements.” (Feickert, 2025)

While it is difficult to pinpoint exactly how many military members suffer from Operator Syndrome, it can be defined through the use of a framework that marks its existence. Many SOF members are required to sign NDA’s for some of the duties they perform while serving, making reporting in conjunction with details of their service difficult at times. The syndrome itself does not exist in the DSM-IV, and it is not an official term used by the Department of Veterans Affairs, so the culmination of symptoms relies on the self reporting and psychological/health assessments conducted by the VA, and through HIPAA protected information that is often provided to mental health professionals. However, it rings true with many operators who have left the military and receive a high disability rating, or a complete and total 100% disability rating. “In August 2022, 4.9 million veterans, or 27 percent of all veterans, had a service-connected disability. Veterans with a service-connected disability are assigned a disability rating by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. Department of Defense. Ratings range from 0 to 100 percent, in increments of 10 percentage points, depending on the severity of the condition.” (Employment Situation of Veterans News Release, 2023) Consequences of

Operator Syndrome in Social Situations

With special operators being included in these numbers, we know that they share some of the same symptomology as soldiers experiencing PTSD at a high rate. The difference is that a combination of PTSD, along with this highly specialized level of work, heavy allostatic load and lack of resources for this insular community leaves much to be desired by those leaving the military and looking to transition to civilian life. While colloquially we may hear of “supporting the troops,” for many returning home after long stints in the military, there is little to no understanding of how special operators specifically must make this transition.

It is commonly known that veterans struggling with PTSD have been hesitant to reach out to receive help, be it through the VA system, or through independent programs and foundations started by other former military members. While necessary and tremendously helpful in helping veterans make their way post service, these programs tend to be a “catch all” and rarely hone in on what special operators specifically experience. Charities like the Wounded Warrior project work to help veterans in various dimensions of life, like support, physical and emotional health and spirituality, but have no clear distinction for operators. The Special Operation Warriors Foundation is another that stands to help veteran families who have lost family members to war, and focuses more on the living relatives of those affected. Several other foundations exist to help bring a sense of support and awareness to operators and their families, however, without a concrete foundation of how to precisely treat Operator Syndrome, it is difficult to provide the relief needed in order to quell the various issues that the community faces.

In his book The Fort Bragg Cartel, Seth Harp sought to expose the rampant criminality occurring within special operations at Fort Bragg, possibly due to years of stress, toxic masculinity, and feelings of abandonment by their own military after experiencing intense, frequent deployments. Delving deep into the environment in which the soldiers found themselves, Harp detailed the daily life of operators, and how difficult it is to “come back” to civilian life after finding a sense of freedom on deployment. While special operators are expected to conduct themselves according to the rules of engagement, SOF uses their specialized training and missions to circumvent the norm of what soldiers are supposed to adhere to. Even their clothing, appearance and workout routines are different- setting them apart from the social circles of everyday soldiers and infantry men and women. Harp makes a striking commentary on the links between operators, their PTSD and other symptoms associated with Operator Syndrome, and the deadly consequences of leadership not recognizing when their soldiers are facing heavy allostatic load. Among the crimes committed in the name of running drugs and weapons in and out of Fort Bragg, an astounding number of suspicious deaths, suicides and spousal killings among special operators have led many to question what exactly is going on within this community, and if this phenomenon reaches further than Fort Bragg.

Indeed, the consequences of Operator Syndrome have branched out into the mainstream of mental health concerns within the military community. As leadership continues to cover up

war crimes, suicide rates and violence among soldiers themselves, the issues keep expanding. Among the aforementioned violence among peers, this heavy burden seeps out into the emotional, social and community factions that surround special operators and their loved ones. The moral injury sustained through years of service can cause relational effects that many soldiers spend the latter half of their lives trying to mitigate. Because of the physical and mental toll on the body, total wellness becomes compromised. (Hariss, 2025) The intersection of these symptoms therefore leads to poor connections made within their own community, as well as the one that exists beyond military life.

Causes and Bronfenbrenners Ecological Model

Understanding how Operator Syndrome fits into community systems can be better understood by analyzing it through the lens of Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological model. This model helps to organize how an individual interacts with themselves, their environment and all of the factors that can influence their upbringing and subsequent development into adulthood. Starting at the nucleus of this model is the individual, along with the Microsystem- including friends, family, work, school and neighbors (neighborhood). Soldiers experiencing Operator Syndrome may suffer from broken relationships at this level, due to the inner conflict of survivors guilt, PTSD, marital issues, trouble connecting with their children, and the physical breakdown of their bodies. Our Microsystem offers us our most immediate relationships, and influences our upbringing and behavior within our environments, but we also influence our immediate environments. (Guy-Evans, 2025) If a soldier or veteran is experiencing Operator Syndrome, it is likely that these fractured relationships can further their descent into poor mental and physical health, and in some cases, the damage to relationships are beyond repair. This may be why divorce rates among this population are so high. According to research conducted by the Global SOF Foundation (2021), SOF members experience a 40% divorce rate among their ranks-13 times higher than the rest of the US military.

Another level of this model to consider would be the Exosystem- this includes local governments, close family friends and parents, as well as mass media. While broad, this system has a direct influence on how veterans deal with the issues tandem to Operator Syndrome. For example, much of the warrior ethos previously mentioned contains directly oppositional advice to what medical professionals suggest for dealing with PTSD, TBI, guilt, loss and the decomposition of self. “Manning up”, “embracing the suck”, and being told not to complain are a few ways in which leadership tends to overlook the issues at hand for operators, setting the tone for how these men and women learn to express concerns when they transition out of the military and back into their community. Sociopolitically, the Exosystem system examines how policies put forth by local governments, community organizations, even things like public transportation, influence the Microsystem. For many, the military offers a sense of stability and structure- if an operator comes home without a support system, community with resources, or ways to find camaraderie, it is likely symptoms will increase, as will suffering.

Finally, the Macrosystem, existing around the Exosystem, holds similar definitions on a broader scale. The Macrosystem includes social conditions, ideologies and attitudes. For those in special operations, their Macrosystems embrace a culture of masculinity, brotherhood, aggression and violence of action. While in the military and in deadly situations, this mindframe can be useful, it does not translate well for civilian life. This breakdown of culture that is considered the norm while in uniform leaves much to be desired when soldiers come home. Often, the disconnect between what is widely accepted culturally versus what special operators are trained to adhere to becomes unbearable. Those that former special operators encounter in their daily civilian life cannot possibly know what it feels like to go after high value targets under the cover of darkness and have it be so engrained that it is normal. On the opposite side of this metaphorical coin, a special operator has likely never had to worry about time blocking, paying taxes, preparing their own meals, or even paying bills. A special operators Macrosystem does not concern itself with PTA meetings, social and gender constructs- their Macrosystem while in uniform is focused on what technologically enhanced gear can do for their mission set, or how superior officers expect you to act while accomplishing your mission. These differences alone can compound the effects of Operator Syndrome in ways that mental health professionals may not have even thought of yet.

Conclusion

Operator Syndrome, though newly defined and identified by psychologists, holds promise for examining how we approach treatment for Special Operators, their families and communities. By identifying not only the physical and mental tolls of war, but the community aspects of moral injury, we may be able to develop better routes of treatment and give a name to the struggles that many are facing daily. The Ecological Model provides a useful framework for visualizing just how far reaching this issue is within communities that exist within and outside of the veteran community as a whole. In finding possible solutions through community based efforts, psychologists may be able to help those struggling to balance a life post service, and hone it to fit the needs of Special Operators.

References

[email protected]. (2025, February 13). Operator syndrome: The hidden cost of high-stakes professions. Arena Labs. https://arenalabs.co/operator-syndrome-the-hidden-cost-of-high-stakes-professions/

DeMarco, M. (2024, September 29). Moral injury and operator syndrome. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/soul-console/202408/moral-injury-and-operator-syndrome

Feickert, A. (2025, September 18). U.S. Special Operations Forces (SOF): Background and considerations for Congress | congress.gov | library of Congress. Congress.gov. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RS21048

Frueh, B. C., Madan, A., Fowler, J. C., Stomberg, S., Bradshaw, M., Kelly, K., Weinstein, B., Luttrell, M., Danner, S. G., & Beidel, D. C. (2020). “Operator syndrome”: A unique constellation of medical and behavioral health-care needs of Military Special Operation Forces. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 55(4), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091217420906659

Frueh, C. (2024, March 28). #018: Operator syndrome — dr. Chris Frueh. Green Beret Foundation. https://greenberetfoundation.org/jedburghpodcast/018-operator-syndrome-dr-chris-frueh/

Harris, D. (2025, March). Operator syndrome: The unseen toll of elite military service. The EDS Clinic. https://www.eds.clinic/articles/operator-syndrome-special-forces-illness

Help and support for veterans — veteran programs: WWP. Help and Support for Veterans — Veteran Programs | WWP. (n.d.). https://www.woundedwarriorproject.org/programs

Ivory, R. A., Graber, J. S., Frueh, C., & Cady, H. (2024). Operator syndrome. Nursing, 54(8), 31–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/nsg.0000000000000048

Kerr, P., Kheloui, S., Rossi, M., Désilets, M., & Juster, R.-P. (2020). Allostatic load and women’s brain health: A systematic review. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 59, 100858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2020.100858

Neff, R. (n.d.). SOF for life 2020/2021 survey results . Global SOF Foundation. https://gsof.org/sof-for-life-2020-2021-survey-results-are-here/

Resources. THE SPECIAL FORCES FOUNDATION iCal. (n.d.). https://specialforcesfoundation.org/resources/

Seth Harp, & Kelley Beaucar . (2025, October 14). The Fort Bragg Cartel: A conversation with author Seth Harp. Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. https://quincyinst.org/events/the-fort-bragg-cartel-an-in-person-conversation-with-author-seth-harp/

Staff. (2024, July 24). B. Christopher Frueh, professor of psychology. hilo.hawaii.edu. https://hilo.hawaii.edu/keaohou/2012/10/17/frueh-psychology/

Stew Smith, C. (2021, August 13). Operator syndrome: Managing high allostatic load. Military.com. https://www.military.com/military-fitness/operator-syndrome-managing-high-allostatic-load

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023, March 21). Employment situation of veterans news Release — 2022 A01 results. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/vet_03212023.htm