By skyforbes What it is:
It’s basically a rewriting tool that takes AI-sounding text (rigid structure, repetitive transitions, overly formal tone) and rewrites it to be more human, conversational, and natural. The whole idea is to remove the “AI voice” that detectors often flag.
What I tested
I fed it several short paragraphs written by GPT-4/5 where the tone was:
- too polished
- overly formal
- used repeated patterns (“profoundly,” “significantly,” “in today’s world…”)
- predictable sentence structure
Then I compared the original vs. humanized version.
What I noticed
Pros:
- Much more natural flow (varied sentence length, less robotic structure)
- Removes filler words that AI models overuse
- Sounds like something an actual person would type in a comment or email
- Good for avoiding the “AI summary dryness” you often get from LLMs
- Better than most I have tested.
Cons / Limitations:
- It’s still not a magic pass for every detector
- If the input is very obviously AI-generated, it most of the time softens it good but doesn’t fully disguise patterns
A lot of us use LLMs for writing drafts, notes, summaries, emails, etc., but the outputs often feel too structured or synthetic. Tools like this can help bridge that gap so your writing doesn’t immediately scream “AI.”
I’m curious if anyone else here has used humanizer-style tools to make LLM text feel more personal.
What’s worked for you, and what hasn’t?