Why is Google AI Studio so much better than Antigravity even with the same models?

Hello everyone! I’ve been testing both Google AI Studio and Antigravity using the exact same Gemini models, but I’m noticing a huge difference in quality.

For some reason, AI Studio acts much smarter, especially when it comes to design tasks. I also noticed a weird quirk with the dates: AI Studio correctly uses the current date (e.g., "Copyright 2025"), but when I use the exact same model in Antigravity, it defaults to 2023 or older dates.

Has anyone else noticed this degradation when moving away from Google's native platform? Is it a system prompt issue?

GOOGLE AI STUDIO EXAMPLE RESULTS USING THE SAME MODEL 3 PRO

ANTIGRAVITY Results same model 3 pro.

dont get me wrong both are great for just one prompt but it lacks somethings.

the date example:

this is google ai studio using gemini 3 pro model, if you see the Year is accurate.

the antigravity dosent even provide the dates sometimes nor the copyright part , its a small detail but god it makes it feel good if its there, the google ai studio model just feels more creative.

https://preview.redd.it/lmn1bscdwr2g1.png?width=1809&format=png&auto=webp&s=d01bef50ad0e394e75c38a3be301a6dfc262d1c2

https://preview.redd.it/lqubpn9gwr2g1.png?width=1762&format=png&auto=webp&s=9d1388da6f1c2fecf4de0d6d38ea1c24b799d4fb

you get the point.

Leave a Reply