From “Search Engine” to “Argue-Buddy”: My journey using AI as a stubborn colleague and manual multi-agent debater. Is this the limit?

Hi everyone,

I’m a long-term AI user from China. For years, using AI has felt like playing a single-player game. I’ve been isolated in my own workflow without a community to discuss deep, practical usage. GPT just pointed me to this subreddit, so here I am.

My Journey Like many, I started using AI as a "better Google"—just for facts and explanations. Then I moved to the usual roleplay/task prompts, but I found the outputs too stiff. The AI felt boxed in by my constraints.

The Shift: AI as a Colleague, not a Tool The breakthrough happened when I stopped treating AI as a servant and started treating it as a colleague. I explicitly tell it to:

  • Disagree with me.
  • Challenge my logic.
  • Argue back if my ideas are weak.

I’ve since evolved this into a "Manual Multi-Agent Debate" workflow. I often have GPT and Gemini open simultaneously, feeding them the same topic but assigning them different perspectives to debate each other. I just sit back, watch them fight, and curate the best points. To my surprise, the output from these "arguments" is often superior to anything a single sophisticated prompt could produce. It helps immensely with complex planning, long-form writing, and worldbuilding.

My Question to You I feel like I’ve hit a ceiling with this "manual" approach.

  1. Does anyone else use this "adversarial/debate" workflow?
  2. Are there frameworks or methods to optimize this "colleague" relationship?
  3. Where do advanced users hang out to discuss these deeper mental models?

I’m eager to learn from you all.

PS: I don’t speak English. This post was drafted, translated, and refined through multiple rounds of AI verification to ensure clarity. Hope it gets the message across!

Leave a Reply