By skyforbes I’ll listen to narrations and I can just tell for no exact reason that it wasn’t written by a human. I know there’s certain things that can kinda prove something is or isn’t written by a human under certain circumstances: frequent grammatical error usually points to a human author; graduate level writing from a high school student easily points towards AI;and unusual style from a student can point towards AI. Of course, AI could fake grammatical errors to try to appear more human upon command.
I think the thing I’m trying to get at is that despite these telltale signs of AI or human writing, there’s a sense of unease at some things that scream AI for no particular reason. At a larger scale, when AI gets more advanced, it’s possible that “indistinguishable” ai generated videos can be distinguished in a similar way for no particular reason. That is, there’s no clear signs of AI use like multiple quality of the video or someone having multiple fingers, but that we can still tell a difference.
From a more radical conspiracy theorist standpoint, did humans once create something of a Frankenstein that was more evolutionarily advanced than them and have to fight it off by their own instinct, potentially only being able to distinguish this being from each other by that instinctual mean? Probably not, and I should probably go to bed, but I figure I’d throw this out here just to see how people react to it.
TL;DR I think humans might have an ability to distinguish AI generated content from human content by means apart from clearly visible signs.