Before I release my free prompt, I need to solve THIS problem.

Question for prompt engineers and AI system builders:

Why do many prompts lose accuracy over time, even when nothing is changed?

I’m not talking about lazy prompts.
I mean fully structured, layered prompts that start strong…
but by the 5th–10th run, the output becomes weaker, inconsistent, or off-track.

Over the past 2 weeks I tested:

• GPT-3.5 / GPT-4 / Claude 3 / Gemini
• Fresh chat vs continued thread
• Freestyle prompts vs layered system prompts

Same result every time:

✅ New chat = accuracy restored
❌ Same thread = output slowly drifts

I was going to release a free version of one of my prompt systems today,
but I decided to pause — because shipping a drifting system helps nobody.

So here’s the question:

Q: What do you think causes this drift?

A) Model state contamination
B) Hidden memory / bias accumulation
C) Prompt structure fatigue
D) Context-window residue
E) Something else?

Once the discussion settles, I’ll follow up with:

✅ Drift test log summary (publishing soon)
✅ The “anti-drift” prompt architecture
✅ A stable .txt demo file (free download)

Let’s solve the drift problem before we ship unreliable tools.

Leave a Reply