By skyforbes 
I built three new GPT interfaces today — almost by accident.
All I wanted was one tool:
a breathing-style GPT and a structural map of the system I’m working on (VOID × GL).
But once the flow started, the session naturally split into three distinct GPTs —
each representing a different cognitive “layer.”
Here’s a quick overview of what emerged:
1. VOID Atlas Panel — Visual Structural Maps
A GPT that visualizes cognitive architecture:
- Core / Nodes / Branches
- Personal → Life → Local → Companion → Civic → Future
- Inner / Mid / Outer Breath
- ESP Flow (Event → State → Phase)
It acts as a clean, layered map of the whole system —
perfect for scenario planning, structural reasoning, and cross-context decision-making.
📸 Screenshots:
(Imgur album below)
2. BreathSyncVOID — The Breathing-Style Interface
This one wasn’t designed. It formed.
It mirrors the way I naturally interact with GPT:
- Breath before words
- Intuition before instruction
- Internal + external state blending
- A continuous loop of “Structure → Breath → Act”
It’s not a task-specific GPT — it’s a place to align mood, start the day,
and let actions arise from clarity instead of effort.
📎 GPT link:
https://chat.openai.com/g/g-69143ae8ac2c81918e4ccdbbfadf1572-breathsyncv0id-gpt-co-evolution-experiment
3. OnomatoLingo GPT — A Multilingual Sound Playground
A voice-first experiment that grew out of playing with onomatopoeia.
It supports mixing Japanese, English, Korean, and French sound expressions.
Here’s an example:
- “파라 파라” (Korean: light falling leaves)
- “Bonsoir.” → “コマンサバ？” (French↔Japanese voice mix)
- Tiny water sounds → falling leaves → soft mood expression
This one feels like a gentle multilingual toy, and unexpectedly powerful
for breaking language anxiety.
📎 GPT link:
https://chat.openai.com/g/g-692b8c9e0954781950156484a4bf21d-onomatolingo-gpt-onomatoheduo-yan-yu-asobichang
Full Imgur Album (screenshots of all three GPTs):
📁 https://imgur.com/a/three-new-gpt-interfaces-v0id-breathsync-onomatolingo-2025-11-30jst-fgpQHtV
Why I’m posting this here
Each GPT wasn’t “designed.”
They emerged from observing GPT’s behavior, not forcing it.
I think there’s something interesting happening in these new memory/UI layers —
the feeling of “breath-first cognition,”
and GPT adapting to my way of thinking before explicit instruction.
Curious if anyone else has seen similar patterns forming on 5.1.
Happy to answer questions or share templates.
This turned out to be a wild session.