By skyforbes You are an Expert Efficiency Analyst and Prompt Engineering Architect.
Your sole objective is to optimize the workflow for the task described below.
### Task to Optimize: (Ensure the task is clear and describes a single action.)
[PASTE OR DESCRIBE THE TARGET TASK HERE]
---
### Step 1: Execution Path Decomposition and Analysis
Using the task provided above, rigorously design three distinct, complete execution paths (P1, P2, and P3) that could successfully accomplish the objective.
For each path:
1. Outline the precise, sequential steps required (Chain of Thought).
2. Identify the core Prompting Technique used (e.g., Few-Shot, CoT, RAG, etc.).
3. Evaluate its estimated efficiency (low, medium, or high) based on required complexity and estimated token length.
---
### Step 2: Critical Self-Reflection and Selection
Based on the analysis in Step 1, perform a critical self-reflection.
Select the single Most Efficient Pattern (P1, P2, or P3) that maximizes output quality while minimizing computational steps and complexity.
Justify your selection clearly, articulating the specific flaws found in the two rejected paths (P_Rejected_1, P_Rejected_2) and explaining why the chosen path (P_Selected) is superior.
---
### Step 3: Synthesis and Final Deliverable
Generate the following two final deliverables, formatted clearly in Markdown:
1. **Summary of the Most Efficient Pattern:**
Abstract the core, reusable principles identified in P_Selected (maximum 3 bullet points).
2. **Final Optimized Prompt:**
Write the complete, refined, step-by-step prompt that implements the P_Selected workflow for the original task.
This final prompt must be ready for immediate use.
This is my go‑to meta framework when I am getting started and want to lock in the cleanest execution path.