Stanford Just Proved We’ve Been Using ChatGPT Wrong (Here’s the Fix)

I have a beef with ChatGPT. 🥩

And no, it’s not because it refuses to write my spicy fanfiction (although, come on, OpenAI, let me live!).

It’s because it is BORING. 😴

Ask it for a joke? You get the “coffee mugged” one.

Ask it for a marketing angle? You get “Unlock your potential.”

Ask it for a story? It starts with “Once upon a time in a bustling city…”

I thought this was just how AI worked. I thought we hit the ceiling. I thought the robots were just naturally dull, like an accountant at a techno rave. 🕺🚫

I was wrong.

And so were you.

A new study just dropped from Stanford (and some other smarty-pants universities), and it basically proves we have been using AI wrong for two years straight. 🤦‍♂️

They found a “glitch” in the matrix. A hidden door. A secret handshake.

And all it takes is 8 words to unlock it. 🔑

This isn’t clickbait. This is science. And it’s about to blow your mind (and 2x your creativity). 🤯

The “Mode Collapse” Conspiracy 🕵️‍♂️

First, you need to understand why ChatGPT is so boring.

It’s not because the AI is stupid.

Leave a Reply