
What haunts me is the chorus of defenders who cling to him with a devotion so desperate it crowds out their last working neurons. They watch a man deteriorate in real time and call it strength. They witness his confusion, his fabricated surprises, his inability to recall his own decisions, and they insist it is all part of some mythic plan. Do they feel even a flicker of guilt for consuming air that could be put to use by someone capable of forming an independent thought. Do they ever pause long enough to realise they are enabling a level of mental deterioration that would disqualify anyone else from running a lemonade stand. They cling to him because letting go would require admitting they tethered their identity to a man who cannot remember what he has done, what he has said, or what office he holds at any given hour.
And we all know exactly how the next act unfolds, because these people are as predictable as mould on stale bread. The instant anyone so much as gestures toward Trump’s glaring cognitive decay, his flock will come stampeding in with their pre rehearsed incantation about Joe Biden, as if chanting another man’s name somehow rewires Trump’s deteriorating brain. They will fling that whataboutism into the room with the triumphant energy of someone who thinks they have delivered a masterstroke, when in reality they have only announced to the world that they are terrified of engaging with a single fact head on. It is the rhetorical equivalent of a child squeezing their eyes shut and insisting no one can see them. Anyone who attempts this deserves ridicule so searing it leaves scorch marks on their dignity. If you cannot defend your chosen messiah without dragging in a completely unrelated old man, you are not debating. You are confessing your intellectual bankruptcy in real time. People who behave this way should be treated like the conversational dead weight they insist on being, because they have chosen the path of willful stupidity and earned every drop of scorn that comes with it.
