To all the kernel devs out there, is it so hard to find a middle ground with DRM and anticheat companies?

Like couldnt Linus just reach some sort of an agreement with them so that (who ever volunteer choses to) one can install a special revision of current version kernel (e.g in the same way there is a low latency revision) which would provide kernel support for such anticheat or DRM (e.g netflix) software and let them run only when their associated app runs too (e.g only when I run netflix or when I run the game that has an anticheat as a prerequisite)

Like I find it a shame that valve (obviously not due to charity but still it as a end user I appreciate it) puts so much effort and manages to support to many games only for a few dozens of outliers (that happen to be supper popular though) to not being supported because of their anticheat engines.

I think this is one reason many people still keep on running windows as a main OS because there is no quality of life solution for using such games or software.

Like how many antic heat and DRM packages are out there? finite, what resources they ask access to? I would guess finite and most would use the same resources, why not just grand them that privilege so that they can do what they want to do even if it is basically spying on the user (obviously only if the user voluntarily decides to download and execute the particular kernel revision that can allow for this)

Like what is blocking progress towards this? plain indifference from one side or an other? or is there a deeper legitimate reason that doesnt allow for common ground to be found?