Trail Running as a Therapeutic Modality: A Meta-Analytic Review of its Efficacy in
Anxiety Management and Resilience Building
Owen R. Thornton
Abstract
The proposition that natural environments can confer significant mental health benefits is no
longer a fringe concept but a subject of extensive scientific inquiry. As global populations
become increasingly urbanized, the search for accessible, non-pharmacological interventions to
mitigate the rising prevalence of mental health disorders has intensified.1 This has led to the
formalization of concepts such as “green exercise,” which involves physical activity in the
presence of nature, and “ecotherapy,” which encompasses a range of structured therapeutic
interventions that utilize natural environments to promote healing.4 Trail running, the specific
focus of this report, exists at the intersection of these domains, representing a potent form of
green exercise that is increasingly being adopted not for competition, but for its perceived
therapeutic value. This section synthesizes the broad evidence base for nature-based health
interventions (NBHIs) to establish the scientific context from which the specific benefits of trail
running emerge. It will review the documented psychological and physiological effects, examine
the quantitative evidence from existing meta-analyses, and explore the theoretical frameworks
that explain these phenomena. Crucially, it will also address the methodological complexities and
limitations that characterize this field, providing a balanced and critical foundation for the
subsequent analysis.
1.1 The Scientific Basis of “Green Exercise” and Ecotherapy
The terms “green exercise,” “ecotherapy,” and “nature-based health interventions (NBHIs)”
describe a continuum of activities, ranging from incidental exposure to nature during physical
activity to highly structured, professionally guided therapeutic programs.2 At its core, this field
of study investigates the synergistic effect of combining physical activity with exposure to
natural environments.8 The body of research supporting the benefits of this synergy is substantial
and growing. A host of positive outcomes have been linked to nature exposure, including
improved attention, lower stress, enhanced mood, a reduced risk of psychiatric disorders, and
even increases in pro-social behaviors like empathy and cooperation.10 These interventions are
increasingly recognized as valuable, non-pharmacological adjuncts to conventional mental health
treatments, offering accessible, low-threshold, and sustainable strategies for managing mentalwell-being.1
The evidence points to a wide spectrum of both physiological and psychological effects.
Systematic reviews have demonstrated that engaging in green exercise can lead to significant and
measurable physiological changes. These include reductions in diastolic and systolic blood
pressure, resting heart rate, and levels of the stress hormone cortisol.5 Concurrently, the
psychological benefits are profound, with consistent findings showing reductions in symptoms of
anxiety, depression, anger, confusion, and fatigue.9 The combination of these effects underscores
the holistic impact of nature-based interventions, which simultaneously address the physiological
and psychological manifestations of stress and mental distress.
1.2 Meta-Analytic Evidence for Affective and Psychological Benefits
To move beyond qualitative descriptions and establish the magnitude of these effects, researchers
have employed meta-analysis to quantitatively synthesize the results of multiple studies. These
analyses provide a robust statistical foundation for the claims of green exercise’s mental health
benefits. A landmark multi-study meta-analysis, which aggregated data from 10 UK studies
involving 1,252 participants, found statistically significant overall effect sizes for improvements
in both self-esteem ($d = 0.46$, $p < 0.00001$) and mood ($d = 0.54$, $p < 0.00001$)
following acute bouts of green exercise.4 This provides strong quantitative evidence for a direct
and positive psychological impact.
The effect is particularly pronounced in the domain of negative affect. A separate meta-analysis
of 19 controlled trials with a combined 1,662 participants concluded that green exercise may
significantly lower a range of negative affective states, including anxiety, tension, anger,
depression, and fatigue.9 Another comprehensive review focusing specifically on urban green
exercise synthesized data to find a moderate and statistically significant positive impact on
mental health, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of $-0.40$ ($95\%$ CI = $-0.56$ to
$-0.25$; $p < 0.001$).1 These findings are further corroborated by meta-analyses of NBHIs
targeted at individuals with diagnosed conditions, which have found large effect sizes for the
reduction of both anxiety and depression symptoms.2
However, a critical nuance appears when examining the impact on positive affect. While
negative affect is consistently and significantly reduced, the effect on overall positive affect has
not been found to be statistically significant in some large-scale meta-analyses.9 Despite this,
these same studies often report significant increases in specific positive emotions and states, such
as vigor, comfort, natural feeling, and relaxation.9 This suggests that the primary mechanism of
green exercise may be more strongly related to the alleviation of negative psychological states
than to the generation of overarching positive ones, a distinction that is crucial for a precise
understanding of its therapeutic action. The following table summarizes the key quantitative
findings from several prominent meta-analyses in the field.Table 1.1: Summary of Meta-Analytic Findings on the Psychological Effects of Green
Exercise
Study
(Source ID)
No. of
Studies
Total
Participants
Primary
Outcome(s)
Comparison Effect Size
(95% CI)
Key
Conclusion
Barton &
Pretty, 2010 4
10 1252 Self-Esteem,
Mood
Pre- vs.
Post-Interven
tion
Self-Esteem:
$d = 0.46$
($0.34,
0.59$) Mood:
$d = 0.54$
($0.38,
0.69$)
Green
exercise
leads to
significant
short-term
improvement
s in
self-esteem
and mood.
Weng &
Chiang, 2022
9
19 1662 Negative
Affect,
Positive
Emotions
Green vs.
Non-Green
Exercise
Not
specified, but
significant
References:
Previous Works
Owen R. Thornton, Sophia Ly, Isabella Colón et al. The Psychological Indicators of Success in Ultrarunning — A Review of the Current Psychological Predictors in Ultrarunning, 15 March 2023, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2675495/v1]
Owen R. Thornton, Wenjun Li, Hunter Cole, and Isabella Cólon. 2023. “Borderline Personality Disorder and Neuroplasticity: A Review”. International Neuropsychiatric Disease Journal 19 (2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/indj/2023/v19i2367.
Ahtshamullah Chaudhry, Kimberly Morton Cuthrell, and Owen R Thornton. 2023. “Peptic Ulcer Disease; Stomach and Gastric Ulcers, a Concise Review”. International Research Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 6 (1):30–39. https://journalirjgh.com/index.php/IRJGH/article/view/73.
Owen R. Thornton. 2023. “Effective Ultramarathon Pacing Strategies on Road and Trail: A Narrative Review”. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports 17 (4):1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2023/v17i4474.
Owen R. Thornton, Wenjun Li, Hunter Cole, and Isabella Cólon. 2023. “The Role of the Hippocampus in Borderline Personality Disorder: Structural and Functional Abnormalities”. International Neuropsychiatric Disease Journal 19 (2):28–38. https://doi.org/10.9734/indj/2023/v19i2370.
Owen R. Thornton. 2023. “Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in Depression: A Mini Review of Clinical and Preclinical Evidence”. International Neuropsychiatric Disease Journal 20 (3):47–56. https://doi.org/10.9734/indj/2023/v20i3399.
Owen R. Thornton, Wenjun Li, Hunter Cole, and Isabella Cólon. 2023. “The Role of the Hippocampus in Borderline Personality Disorder: Structural and Functional Abnormalities”. International Neuropsychiatric Disease Journal 19 (2):28–38. https://doi.org/10.9734/indj/2023/v19i2370.
Owen R. Thornton, and Wenjun Li. 2024. “Global Trends and Correlations in Mental Health Disorders: A Comprehensive Analysis from 1990 to 2019”. International Neuropsychiatric Disease Journal 21 (2):36–53. https://doi.org/10.9734/indj/2024/v21i2425.
Owen R. Thornton. 2023. “Varying Levels of Carbohydrate and Fat Diets for Ultramarathon Running: A Review on Performance and Health Outcomes”. Asian Journal of Food Research and Nutrition 2 (3):93–103. https://journalajfrn.com/index.php/AJFRN/article/view/33.
Thornton, Owen R. The Role of Physical Activity On Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factors and Mental Health. 2025. https://doi.org/10.17615/xq7w-5t89
Thornton, O. R. (2025). The convergent frontier: Artificial intelligence in treatment planning for neural regeneration and tissue engineering in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Thornton, O. R. (2025). What education could be: The AI method.
Thornton, O. R., & Li, W. (2025). Bulimia nervosa causing unknown threat to oral health: A comprehensive review. International Neuropsychiatric Disease Journal, 22(3), 166–174.
Thornton, O. R., & Li, W. (2025). The psychology and psychopathology of ultrarunning: Mental health and psychiatric insights into extreme endurance athletes. International Neuropsychiatric Disease Journal, 22(1), 1–5.
Thornton, O. R. (2024). Literature review: Recent advances in neuroscience. Medium.
Thornton, O. R. (2023). A current mini-review on the role of neuroplasticity in the treatment and management of borderline personality disorder.
Thornton, O. R. (2023). An overview of the role of neuroplasticity in the pathophysiology and treatment of mental illness: A mini-review.
Thornton, O. R. (2023). The role of neuroplasticity in the pathophysiology and treatment of mental illness: A comprehensive literature review.
Thornton, O. R. Sleep in elite ultrarunners: A look into athlete health.
11th
Learn more about Trail Running as a Therapeutic Modality: A Meta-Analytic Review of its Efficacy in
